For editors & publishers

Know what you’re publishing.

Freelance copy, guest posts, agency deliveries — paste text, drop a folder of files, or check the live URL. You get a score, the marked lines, and a report you can attach to the conversation with the writer.

Built for the workflow

From single drafts to a whole content batch.

Batch scan

Drop up to 20 files, pasted pieces or URLs and get a scored table — average, outliers, and a CSV export for the record.

Check live pages

Paste a URL and scan what's actually published — yours or a writer's portfolio.

Evidence, not accusations

Every score comes with the lines marked and the patterns named in plain English — feedback a writer can act on instead of dispute.

PDF reports & history

Export a report per piece, keep history per writer, and compare drafts across revisions.

FAQ

Common questions.

Can I check a writer's work without storing it?

Yes. Anonymous scans are never stored. With a free account you choose per scan whether to save it to your history.

What if a writer disputes the result?

Send them the marked-up result or PDF report — it shows which lines read machine-written and why. That turns a standoff into an edit list. And remember: no detector is proof; treat high scores as a conversation starter.

Does it handle whole websites?

The batch tool takes up to 20 URLs at once today; scheduled full-site monitoring is on the roadmap.

How can I tell if a freelancer used AI?

Two signals beat any single score: a style break from their past work, and what the scanner marks. Paste the piece — if whole sections light up with stock phrasing and metronome rhythm, send those lines back as an edit request and watch how they respond.

Will AI content hurt my site's SEO?

Google's stated target is mass-produced low-value content, however it's made — and in practice thin AI text underperforms. The risk isn't a secret AI penalty; it's publishing writing nobody chose to write. Scan before you publish and fix what reads machine-made.

Should I reject every piece that scores high?

No — auto-rejecting on a score repeats the false-accusation mistake in commercial form. Use the marked lines as the conversation: heavy marks on a first draft is feedback; heavy marks on a 'final, fully human' delivery is a different discussion.

Check a text right now — free, nothing stored. Open the scanner →
AI detection is not 100% accurate. Every result is an estimate from writing patterns and can be wrong both ways. Never use it as the sole basis for a decision about a person, and never to accuse.